In a recent decision, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals addressed Florida's controversial "Stop WOKE" Act, which sought to limit mandatory employer-led training on topics deemed objectionable by the state, specifically those related to discrimination, diversity, equity, and inclusion.
The court's ruling struck down these provisions, emphasising the paramount importance of the First Amendment and its protections against content and viewpoint discrimination.
This decision reaffirms employers' right to conduct mandatory training sessions on a wide range of topics, including sensitive issues surrounding diversity and inclusion, without fear of punitive action from the state.
In the judgment of Shopee Singapore Pte Ltd v. Lim Teck Yong [2024] SGHC 29, the High Court of Singapore explored the balance between enforcing restrictive covenants in employment contracts and preserving an individual's right to work.
The judgment critically examines the enforceability of non-competition and non-solicitation clauses, underscoring the necessity for these covenants to protect legitimate business interests without overly restricting the employee's future employment opportunities.
On 20 December 2023, the Argentine government introduced Decree 70/2023, aimed, among others, at reshaping the employment landscape.
This reform was, however,halted. Trade unions obtained injunctions against the enforcement of the labour chapter and a partial ruling by a labour court has suspended the effects of the new law.
The decision now lies with the national Supreme Court of Justice.
On 8 February 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided on whistleblower protections under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The case clarifies the standards for proving retaliation against whistleblowers in publicly traded companies.
The Supreme Court clarified that whistleblowers are required to show that their protected activity contributed to the adverse employment action without the need to demonstrate retaliatory intent on the employer's part.
In R v Greater Sudbury (City) 2023 SCC 28, the Supreme Court of Canada stated that the City of Sudbury, which had contracted with a third-party constructor for a construction project, had duties as an "employer" to ensure worker health and safety in the workplace, by the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act (the "OHSA").
On 2 November 2023, the Norwegian Supreme Court stated that offshore workers’ so-called “available time” - when the employee is available for the employer - pursuant to their CBA does not correspond to “working hours” under the Working Environment Act (“WEA”).